Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1940No. 9614PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellee’s petition asks this court for its order requiring that a portion of the evidence alleged to have been received below be certified to this court and that upon receipt thereof an order be made requiring the district court to'ipiake a specified finding favorable to appellee.

The so-called petition is in reality a motion and violates our Rule 17 by failing to state its points and authorities. Appellee also makes no reply to appellant’s brief in opposition, thus throwing an unwarrant*625able burden on opposing counsel and this court, the impropriety being heightened…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salvatore D'EmanuElE v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Long Term Disability Plan & Trust Montgomery Ward & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Gilliland v. RodriquezArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Evans v. Suntreat Growers & Shippers, Inc.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. RELIANCE FINANCE CORPORATION and Romer, O’Connor & Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Clyde E. MILLER and Arline A. Miller, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API