Legal Opinion

Sutro Tunnel Co. v. Lipscomb

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 15750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant acquired title to lots 26, 27 and the west 125 feet of lot 25, block 5, range C, Town of Gold Hill, Storey County, Nevada, in 1932. The deed was properly recorded in the Storey County Recorder’s Office.

In 1943, the Storey County Assessor’s Office mistakenly changed the assessment notice by changing the range designation from range C to range O. All tax notices to appellant after that date contained the erroneous property description. The correct property description, however, also remained on the assessment roll.

Appellant continued to receive assessment notices, and continued…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bogart v. LathropNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Brooks v. JensenNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Rodgers v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1920

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Triplett v. David H. Fulstone Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  3. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API