Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Birmingham Stove & Range Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1935No. 22857PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Plaintiff in error commenced this action in the district court of Tulsa county to recover damages in the sum of $2,960, for alleged breach of contract evidenced by the following:
“Birmingham, Ala.
“March 15, 1929.
“This is to certify that in consideration of the assurance of the Manhattan Furniture Company, of Tulsa, Okla., that they will handle our line of gas ranges, and our coal and wood burning cook stoves, ranges and heaters, with exclusion of all others, and give us a substantial volume of business on them, we are constituting them as our exclusive agents in the city of Tulsa and will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Foster v. Atlas Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Staroske v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Sharp v. Pawhuska Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- WESTERN STAR MILL COMPANY v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Old American Life Ins. Co. v. BiggersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Bartlett v. STERLING CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.