Duke v. Steed
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
One defendant in a negligence action appeals from the judgment. The sole issue on this appeal is the order of argument which was set by the court as follows: plaintiff’s counsel No. 1; co-defendant’s counsel No. 1; appellant’s counsel; co-defendant’s counsel No. 2; plaintiff’s counsel No. 2. The court’s ruling complies with all the limitations on its discretion in this matter. Plaintiff received opening and concluding arguments; no more than two counsel per side were permitted to argue; and only one was heard in conclusion. See Code § 24-3320. It was within the court’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hines v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Gunnells v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Pealock v. PealockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berryhill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Bennett v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Goforth v. WigleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Sheriff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Steverson v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.