Legal Opinion

Duke v. Steed

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1972No. 47625PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

One defendant in a negligence action appeals from the judgment. The sole issue on this appeal is the order of argument which was set by the court as follows: plaintiff’s counsel No. 1; co-defendant’s counsel No. 1; appellant’s counsel; co-defendant’s counsel No. 2; plaintiff’s counsel No. 2. The court’s ruling complies with all the limitations on its discretion in this matter. Plaintiff received opening and concluding arguments; no more than two counsel per side were permitted to argue; and only one was heard in conclusion. See Code § 24-3320. It was within the court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hines v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Gunnells v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Pealock v. PealockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Bennett v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Goforth v. WigleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Sheriff v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Steverson v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API