Legal Opinion

Donahoo v. Matthews

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1995No. 95-1453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. SHARP, Judge.

Donahoo and McMenamy, defendants in a law-suit in progress below in Putnam County, Florida, petition for certiorari review of a non-final order entered by the trial court, which denied their motion for a protective order. They assert the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law, and if wrong, they will be without a remedy. It ruled they must appear in Putnam County for the taking of their depositions. Under the circumstances of this case, we disagree and grant the writ.

Donahoo and McMenamy are attorneys associated with the firm of Donahoo, Donahoo and Ball,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Madax International Corp. v. DELCHER INTERCONTINENTAL MOVING SERV. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  2. Fortune Ins. Co. v. SantelliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Kaufman v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Patterson v. VenneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Godshall v. HessenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Logitech Cargo, USA, Corp. v. JW Perry, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Triple Fish America, Inc. v. Triple Fish International, L.C.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. CVS Caremark Corp. v. LatourDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Polselli v. Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. State v. Z.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API