United States v. One Single Family Residence Located at 6960 Miraflores Avenue
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCOTT, District Judge.
This controversy presents serious issues involving the civil forfeiture law, 21 U.S.C. § 881, and its impact upon lending institutions. It brings into play the duties and obligations of a commercial lending institution when unmistakable “red flags” have been raised as to the involvement of drug-related proceeds in a financial transaction. Concomitantly, it presents to the Court the duty to define the standard of conduct for lending institutions in such cases. We venture forward fully cognizant of this opinion’s precedent-setting nature.
I. HISTORY OF THE…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Banco Cafetero Panama, Banco Cafetero Colon, Defendants-In-Rem-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. One Single Family Residence Located at 15603 85th Avenue NorthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. 8848 South Commercial St., Chicago, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- United States v. One Single Family Residence Located At 6960 Miraflores AvenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. One Single Family Residence Located at 15603Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.