Marshall v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.
The appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to ravish, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate term of not less than six nor more than eight years. We do not undertake to review the evidence, which we have considered with much care; suffice it to say that there was some evidence from- which infer enees might have been drawn by the jury unfavorable to the innocence of the accused. The bill of exceptions does not purport to contain all, or substantially all, of the testimony adduced in the trial of the case, and, this being so, we are constrained to believe there…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Oakley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Crawley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Gaines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Strickland v. Town of SamsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hammond v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Hammond v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Prince v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936