Legal Opinion

State v. Kuminski

Palm Beach County Court

Decided March 1, 1983No. 83-9972-TT A02Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES T. CARLISLE, County Judge, Criminal Division.

The issue in this case is whether Theodore Joseph Kuminski refused to take the breathalyzer test.

The facts of the case are gleaned from the deposition of Trooper Turnquist. The State and defense counsel stipulated that I decide on the basis of this deposition.

Trooper Turnquist arrested a driver of a van for DWI. Mr. Kuminski was a passenger in the van. Trooper Turnquist came to the conclusion Mr. Kuminski was also impaired. (T.4). He told Mr. Kuminski he was in no condition to drive (T.4). Mr. Kuminski went across the street to make a phone…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. People v. GurseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wolf v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API