Shillingford v. Dielinger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s determination that she failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of child support (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Grade v Donovan, 84 AD3d 1375, 1376 [2011]; Matter of Simmons v Simmons, 71 AD3d 775, 776 [2010]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heyward v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Simmons v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gracie v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Redd v. BurrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016