Legal Opinion

Shillingford v. Dielinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the mother’s objections to the Support Magistrate’s determination that she failed to establish a substantial change in circumstances warranting an upward modification of child support (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Matter of Grade v Donovan, 84 AD3d 1375, 1376 [2011]; Matter of Simmons v Simmons, 71 AD3d 775, 776 [2010]; Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Lott, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heyward v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Gracie v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Redd v. BurrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016