Legal Opinion

Curnutt v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2004No. 26025PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.

The driving privileges of Charles Cur-nutt (“Driver”) were revoked by Missouri’s Director of Revenue (“Director”) after Driver allegedly refused to submit to a chemical test to determine his blood alcohol content. This revocation was based on Missouri’s Implied Consent Law, specifically § 577.041.1. 1 Driver appealed that revocation to the circuit court. The case was submitted to the circuit court solely on Director’s records, i.e., there was no live testimony. The court found that Director failed to meet her burden of proof and ordered reinstatement of Driver’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Brown v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Zimmerman v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Gonzalez v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Furne v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Howdeshell v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Middlemas v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Zummo v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API