State v. Kuns
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
-This was an indictment founded on the SSd section of the act relative to crime and punishment. ktev. Stat. 1 838. The indictment charges that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., unlawfully, maliciously, and mischievously destroyed, and did then and there maliciously and mischievously cause to be destroyed, a certain quantity of potatoes, the personal property of one Benjanz~n Ross, pf the value of five dollars, by then and there, &c.
After a verdict of guilty, the Court arrested the judgment and discharged the defendant.
The main point relied upon by the defendant, in support of the judgment of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Durham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1819
- State v. MerrillIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Rosenbarger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. SlocumIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
- United States v. HullDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1882
- State v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.