Legal Opinion

State v. Kuns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

ERROR to the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

-This was an indictment founded on the SSd section of the act relative to crime and punishment. ktev. Stat. 1 838. The indictment charges that the defendant, on, &c., at, &c., unlawfully, maliciously, and mischievously destroyed, and did then and there maliciously and mischievously cause to be destroyed, a certain quantity of potatoes, the personal property of one Benjanz~n Ross, pf the value of five dollars, by then and there, &c.

After a verdict of guilty, the Court arrested the judgment and discharged the defendant.

The main point relied upon by the defendant, in support of the judgment of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Durham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1819
  2. State v. MerrillIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Rosenbarger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State v. SlocumIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  4. United States v. HullDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1882
  5. State v. BurgessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API