Legal Opinion

Trussell v. Ripps

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 1964No. 1 Div. 222PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Justice.

The appellee has moved that this judgment be affirmed because no errors have-been assigned.

The suing out of an appeal is analogous, to the institution of a new suit. The assignment of errors correspond to the complaint or bill in the original proceedings. Snellings v. Jones, 33 Ala.App. 301, 33 So.2d 371. Without any assignment of error, an appeal can present nothing for review. This defect is jurisdictional.

Appellee’s motion, though superfluous, is due to be granted. Had no motion been filed, the judgment would of necessity stand affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snellings v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Tidwell v. Town of Town CreekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  3. Erwin v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Patterson v. GainsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Belcher v. City Commission of City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  3. Mathis v. Board of School Com'rs of Mobile CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Ex parte RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Williams v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API