Legal Opinion

Brazerol v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 1, 1971No. [No. 432, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaknes, J.

The two questions presented to us in this case involving alleged trespass to land are (1) Did the appellants, Alfred J. Brazerol and Shelby J. Brazerol, his wife — plaintiffs below—prove a trespass to their land? and (2) Did the trial court err in allegedly finding justification for the supposed trespass when there had been no special plea filed by the appellees — defendants below — pleading justification? The Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (Loveless, J.) dismissed the action upon a motion by the defendants at the end of the plaintiffs’ testimony, denied a motion by the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Patapsco Loan Co. v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  3. Walsh v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  4. Gusdorff & Joseph v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  5. Hamilton v. WindolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kelly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Kraft Foods, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Walker v. HallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. North v. PUBLIC SERV. CO., ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API