Legal Opinion

Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 6, 1996No. 2:95-mj-00748PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

On April 19, 1996, a jury in this Court found that Plaintiff Christine Rush had been discriminated against on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e — 2000e-17 (1994) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. §§ 951-63 (1991 & Supp.1994). The jury awarded Plaintiff an amount in excess of four million dollars and Plaintiff subsequently accepted a remittitur of this amount to $603,-000. Plaintiff now seeks an award of attorney’s fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  2. Valenti v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Hall v. Harleysville InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. HUBER v. SIMON'S AGENCY, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Moorehead v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALLENTOWNDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API