Commonwealth v. Garcia
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKantrowitz, J.
When former trial counsel testified, at a hearing on the defendant’s motion for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel, that “it is not my practice to talk to government witnesses” and that he puts on his own witnesses “cold,” the first prong of Saferian1 was essentially established. *168When trial counsel failed to interview and call a witness who, in part, directly contradicted the allegations of a complainant, the judge did not abuse his discretion in allowing the motion, determining that the second prong of Saferian was also met.
Facts. The defendant, a former part-time teacher…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. SatterfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. AcevedoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BaranMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HamptonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. OcasioMassachusetts Superior Court · 2010