Legal Opinion

Thrailkill v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1928No. 18604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFNER. J.'

S. A. Doyle, defendant in ■error, as plaintiff, brought suit against J. G. Thrailkill, plaintiff in error, as defendant, lor possession of certain lots in the town of Maud, Okla. Plaintiff alleged lie was the owner of a lease on the property beginning August 28, 1925, and ending August 28, 1926; and that he obtained a judgment in a justice of the peace court on the 11th day of September, 1925, for the possession of the property. He further alleged the reasonable iental value of the property was $40 per month, and prayed judgment for double the amount of the rental value. After a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mounts v. Reed Stores Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Dills v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Anderson v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API