Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1960No. 4 Div. 421PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge.

The indictment charged defendant with removing or selling two bales of cotton and two tons of peanuts with the purpose of hindering, delaying or defrauding one Yates C. Willoughby, who is alleged to have had a lawful and valid claim thereto, under a written instrument, lien created by law for rent and advances, or other lawful and valid claim, verbal or written. Title 14, Section 363, Code 1940.

To sustain a conviction of the offense with which defendant was charged, the state was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that C. Yates Willoughby had a lawful and valid claim to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Varnum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Courtney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Shaw v. KinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Wiley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Steele v. BrooksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API