Floan v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Goodhue county to recover $2,000 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Williston, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for the sum demanded. Prom an order granting defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, .plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of defendant, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $2,000. Upon defendant’s motion the court below ordered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, and plaintiff appealed.
The facts are as follows: Plaintiff was in the employ of defendant *114as a laborer, and was struck by one of its switch engines and seriously-injured. At the time of the accident defendant was engaged in making extensive changes in the yard tracks at Red Wing, the place of the accident, and plaintiff, with other laborers, was employed in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Erickson v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bragg v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Sours v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Magliani v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Larson v. HaglinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Torkelson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Cornell v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Ashe v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.