Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 26, 1957No. 37890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

This proceeding was instituted by Robert S. Hubbard, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, who sought the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to grant to plaintiff the right to participate in the benefits and protection of the Police Pension and Retirement System of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma. An alternative writ was issued and defendant filed its answer in response thereto. Plaintiff filed a demurrer to such answer, which was by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Tobly v. DekinderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Robertson v. State Ex Rel. PinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Western Auto Store v. Auto Parts & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Russell v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Weiss v. State ex rel. LeimbackWyoming Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API