Legal Opinion

Lam & Rogers v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Coryell County; J. H. Arnold, Judge. Action by Lam & Rogers and another against the St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company of Texas. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

Appellants Lam & Rogers owned a seedhouse adjacent to appellee’s side track in the town of Oglesby, which, with its contents, was destroyed by fire on the 16th of September, 1910, and this action was brought by them and the Scottish Union & National Insurance Company to recover damages therefor, alleging that the fire was set thereto by sparks and cinders escaping from ap-pellee’s engine on account of the negligent failure of appellee to equip said engine with the best and most approved spark arresters in use, and negligence in operating the same. It was further alleged that the building and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cockrill v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Robinson v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Weaver v. NugentTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. T. & P. R'y Co. v. O'DonnellTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. San Antonio Traction Co. v. YostCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mannheim Ins. Co. v. Charles Clarke & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. MotleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API