Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 7, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

The question presented on this appeal is whether entering a building through a previously-broken window in a locked frame constitutes a “breaking” within the meaning of our Burglary Statute, 11 Del.C. § 391(a) (4). 1 The Superior Court held that it does and charged the jury accordingly. The defendants were convicted of burglary in the fourth degree, a felony. They appeal.

We disagree that entering a building through a previously-broken window brings the offense within the meaning of § 391(a) (4), though the frame be locked. It is our opinion that such offense constitutes, at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herhal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Porter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  3. Tremble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HauserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API