Legal Opinion

C. F. Harms Co. v. Cornell Steamboat Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 11, 1932No. Nos. 12801, 12806, 12968Published

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

These three causes were tried together, and involve a collision between two tows, the one south-bound, and the.other north-bound, in the Hudson river near New Baltimore, some 20 miles or so south of Albany, on October 23,1931.

A. In the first cause, the libelant, as owner of the deck scow Saturn, seeks to recover for damage sustained by the latter, in the south-bound tow, against the steamtug Perseverance having the said scow in tow, and the Cornell Steamboat Company as owner; and against the tug K. Whittelsey, the tug in charge of the north-bound tow, and OÜ Transfer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The AnthraciteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. Wood Towing Corp. v. Southern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. Lehigh Valley Transp. Co. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  4. The Nathan HaleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API