Legal Opinion

Brumm v. Goodman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1948No. 36,988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action on a contract which was in part oral and in part written. Plaintiffs sought specific performance and damages if performance could not be had. The trial court held that the written part of the contract was illegal and void but gave judgment for specific performance under the oral part of the contract. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from various adverse rulings. The principal question here is whether the contract was separable.

In view of the conclusion presently to be stated on the basic issue which determines the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ditzen v. GivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. Roddy v. Hill Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Sage v. Oil Country Specialties Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Limpp v. DodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Early Detection Center, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Will Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Melton v. PrickettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Bradley v. MinorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. Woodmont Corp. v. Rockwood Center PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API