Legal Opinion
Matetzschk v. Lamb
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 18, 2003No. 5D02-455PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
849 So.2d 1141 (2003)
William MATETZSCHK, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
Oscar LAMB, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 5D02-455.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 18, 2003.
Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Cymonie S. Rowe of Dickstein, Reynolds & Woods & Murasko, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Roy D. Wasson, Miami, and David J. Gorewitz, Melbourne, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
COBB, W., Sr. Judge.
We treat Appellee's motion for certification of conflict and certification of question of great public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Willis Shaw Express, Inc. v. Hilyer Sod, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Barnes v. the Kellogg Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Spruce Creek Dev. of Ocala v. DrewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lamb v. MatetzschkSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Cohen v. ArvinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Hess v. WaltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Connell v. FloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- 1 Nation Technology Corp. v. A1 TELETRONICSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.