Legal Opinion

Hoosier Veneer Co. v. Ingersoll

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1922No. 11,166PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Edwin E. Ingersoll against the Hoosier Veneer Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

— This is an appeal from an award of the Industrial Board, and the only question involved is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the board’s finding that appellee was, at the time of his injury, an employe of appellant. It is urged by appellant that the evidence shows appellee to have been, at the time, an independent contractor.

The facts as shown by the evidence are substantially *519as follows: Appellee was a farmer who from time to time hauled logs for timber buyers who had purchased timber in his neighborhood, such work being done by him at such times as it did not interfere with his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDowell v. DuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Coppes Bros. & Zook v. PontiusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Board of Commissioners v. ShertzerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Sargent Paint Co. v. PetrovitzkyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dick v. Gravel Logging Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Marion Malleable Iron Works v. BaldwinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Schraner v. State Department of CorrectionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Barr v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API