Legal Opinion

Muldrow's Heirs v. Fox's Heirs & Devisees

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 14, 1834PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Circuit Court for Woodford County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

The appellants seek the reversal of a judgment in ejectmenf which the appellees obtained against them, for a tract of land, which Arthur Fox, the ancestor of the appellees, bv his will, proved and admitted to record, in May, 1794, directed to be sold for the benefit of his cj1;]¿rer,) an(] which was sold and conveyed, in 1S17, to Andrew Muldrow, the ancestor of the appellants, by Henry Lee and Alexander D. Qrr, the only acting executors of the will of Arthur Fox.

After making sundry specific devises, and after diacting his executors to sell certain tracts of land for raising a fund for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wooldridge's heirs v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1814

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross v. CloreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  2. Clark v. HornthalMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Adams v. ReadnourCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Atzinger v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Vonderhide v. Easy Payment Property Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API