Legal Opinion

Albert v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 3, 1986No. Docket No. 5881-85Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

STEVEN L. ALBERT and JOYCE E. ALBERT, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Albert v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5881-85.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1986-276; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 337; 51 T.C.M. (CCH) 1371; T.C.M. (RIA) 86276;

July 3, 1986.

Steven L. and Joyce E. Albert, pro se.

Dean H. Wakayama, for the respondent.

COUVILLION

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge: This case was assigned pursuant to the provisions of section 7456(d) of the Code 1 and Rule 180.

Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income tax for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Peurifoy v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Reiff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Fausner v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API