New York Telephone Co. v. Ladenheim Fixtures Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
.Jacob Markowitz, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment. The action is upon an account stated which involved the rendition of directory advertising. The motion is based, in addition, upon a demand served pursuant to section 322 of the Civil Practice Act. Defendant fails to respond thereto as required and fails to treat specifically with the alleged account as stated. It does state merely that plaintiff claims to have submitted to the defendant bills and statements which allegedly show the stated indebtedness for classified advertising, but that defendant never received all the bills and…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. Sommer & SommerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Carr v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1961
- Belmet Products, Inc. v. Merit Enterprises, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- People v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1961