Balling v. Manhattan Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby Oonnty. — ■ F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister
The question presented in'this case is whether, upon thq facts alleged in the bill, a valid gift inter vivos was made of a sum of money, amounting to $586.54, from one George Volmer to the complainant, Rosina Balling. The chancellor sustained a demurrer interposed by the defendant, and dismissed complainant’s bill.
The material allegations of the bill are that on the twelfth day of May, 1890, the said George Yolmer opened an account with the defendant, Manhattan Savings Bank & Trust Company, which delivered to the *291said Volmer a deposit book giving Mm credit for the amount deposited on that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Kyle v. ConnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1802
- Marshall v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Dale v. LincolnIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scott v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Chandler v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- O'Brien v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Williams v. ThorntonTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Dodson v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.