Indiana Bell Telephone Co. v. Haufe
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDausman, J.
(after making the foregoing statement) :
The controversy in this case involves two questions only, viz.: (1) Did the employee receive the alleged injury? (2) If so, did the injury cause his death? The contention is that there is no evidence to support the finding with respect to each of these two features. All the evidence that has any bearing on either feature is embodied in the preliminary statement.
It is clear that all the evidence relating to a personal injury alleged to have been received by the employee is of the kind commonly called hearsay. 22 C. J. 199; 10 R. C. L. 958. The general…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Queen v. HepburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Morell v. MorellIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Fuller v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1843
3Cited by12 opinions
- C.T.S. Corp. v. SchoultonIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Anderson v. BortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Bohn Aluminum & Brass Co., Plant 9 v. KinneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- McCoy v. General Glass Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1938
- Frazer v. McMillin & CarsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.