Legal Opinion
City of Tuskegee v. Lacey
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 20, 1985No. 84-415PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
486 So.2d 393 (1985)
CITY OF TUSKEGEE, et al.
v.
Andrew J. LACEY, et al.
84-415.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
December 20, 1985.
Rehearing Denied and Special Concurrence Modified March 31, 1986.
Fred D. Gray and Walter E. McGowan of Gray, Langford, Sapp, Davis & McGowan, Tuskegee, for appellants.
Ira De Ment and Joan Van Almen of De Ment & Wise, Montgomery, for appellees.
2Per curiam
The summary judgment from which this appeal is taken recites the following facts:
This is the Macon County dog track annexation case.
The City of Tuskegee undertook to annex into its city limits the Macon County dog track property by…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Bownes v. Winston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- City of Dothan v. Dale County CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- City of Birmingham v. Community Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Fox Development Company v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- City of Fultondale v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- City of Birmingham v. Blount CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Johnson v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Fort Morgan Civic Ass'n v. City of Gulf ShoresSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.