Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. Burgard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1961No. File 9883, 9884Published

1Opinion of the Court

109 N.W.2d 10 (1961)

Frances A. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant and Appellant.

Frank J. ACKERMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Nick BURGARD, doing business as Burgard and Sons, Defendant and Appellant.

Nos. 9883, 9884.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

April 25, 1961.

Maynes & Myers, Aberdeen, Blaine Simons, Sioux Falls, for defendant-appellant.

H. I. King, Aberdeen, for plaintiffs-respondents.

HANSON, Judge.

In these two actions which have been consolidated for purposes of appeal the plaintiffs, Frank J. Ackerman and Frances A. Ackerman, are…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Griswold Linseed Oil Co. v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Busser v. NobleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956
  4. Ackerman v. BurgardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Searles v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API