Legal Opinion

United States v. Moruzin

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 30, 2008No. Criminal 05-306 (JBS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge:

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court upon the Government’s motion for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication to Defendant Wayne Moruzin to render him competent to stand trial [Docket Item 112], In 2005, Defendant was indicted on charges of bank robbery and jury tampering [Docket Items 10 and 41]. After he began to exhibit increasingly unusual behavior in the proceedings herein, the Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a), ordered that an evaluation of Mr. Moruz-in’s competency to stand trial be performed, after which the Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Aaron GomesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cinnamon McMillian v. The State of New Jersey, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
  2. R. A. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024
  3. R. A. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API