United States v. Moruzin
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court upon the Government’s motion for the involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication to Defendant Wayne Moruzin to render him competent to stand trial [Docket Item 112], In 2005, Defendant was indicted on charges of bank robbery and jury tampering [Docket Items 10 and 41]. After he began to exhibit increasingly unusual behavior in the proceedings herein, the Court, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a), ordered that an evaluation of Mr. Moruz-in’s competency to stand trial be performed, after which the Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Herbert G. Evans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Aaron GomesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cinnamon McMillian v. The State of New Jersey, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- R. A. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024
- R. A. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024