Legal Opinion

Chalkey v. Roush

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

757 A.2d 972 (2000)

Mary CHALKEY a/k/a Mary Matula

v.

Franklin Delano ROUSH Jr., Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued December 1, 1999.

Filed August 7, 2000.

H. Reginald Belden, Jr., Greensburg, for appellant.

Thomas W. Cartwright, Johnstown, for appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, DEL SOLE, POPOVICH, JOHNSON, HUDOCK, FORD ELLIOTT, MUSMANNO, ORIE MELVIN, and LALLY-GREEN, JJ.

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 Franklin Delano Roush, Jr., ("Roush") appeals from the order that declared a contract for the sale of land between Roush and Mary Chalkey, a/k/a Mary Matula ("Matula") null and void and directed Roush to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Soja v. Factoryville Sportsmen's ClubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. DERRY TP., ETC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API