Legal Opinion

Priddy v. Childers

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1922No. 327-3677PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, P. J.

F. T. Childers, defendant in error, sued W. M. Priddy and Dell D. Brasher, plaintiffs in error to recover broker’s commissions in connection with the sale of an oil lease.

Hpon the conclusion of the evidence and before the court delivered its main charge to the jury, plaintiffs in error presented to the court, and the court refused, as indicated by its indorsement, the following special charge:

“Gentlemen of the jury, you are instructed that the evidence introduced in this case is insufficient to sustain a verdict for the plaintiff, and you will therefore find for the defendants, and so say by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Freeman, ReceiverTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Walker v. HaleyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. WaltersTexas Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colle v. Acl Rr. Belgian Azaleas Inc. v. Acl Rr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Priddy v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Williams v. BeloTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. Southern Home Bldg. Co. v. WimbishCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API