Legal Opinion
Howell v. Farrish
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 1986No. 84CA0120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERMAN, Judge.
Two defendants, Dean T. Farrish and Elvi Joanne Barnett, appeal the judgment in favor of plaintiff, Kenneth W. Howell, holding that plaintiff’s redemption of certain real property from a public trustee’s sale pursuant to § 38-39-101, et seq., C.R.S., does not constitute a proceeding against the property that would require compliance with the procedures specified in the homestead exemption statute, § 38-41-201, et seq., C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A).
The issue before us is whether a junior judgment lien creditor may redeem from a public trustee’s sale according to the procedures set…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barnett v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- First National Bank v. Energy Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Walker v. WallaceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- McPhee v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Helkey v. AshleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Janicek v. Obsideo, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- City Center National Bank, N.A. v. BaroneColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Bolen v. Kathleen v. Ferry TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Howell v. FarrishColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kirk White v. State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2013