McConnon & Co. v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “Where the want of jurisdiction over the person is apparent upon the face” of the petition and proceedings, and the defendant has not waived his right to raise such question by plea, answer, or otherwise, he may take advantage of such defect by demurrer or motion to dismiss. Kendrick v. Whitfield, 20 Ga. 379; Wallace v. So. Express Co., 7 Ga. App. 565 (67 S. E. 694); Wash v. Kennedy, 23 Ga. App. 618, 620 (1) (99 S. E. 158). See also Northern Contracting Co. v. Maddux, 144 Ga. 686 (4) (87 R. E. 892); Hartsfield v. Morris, 89 Ga. 254 (15 S. E. 363); Jackson v. Hitchcock, 48 Ga. 491; Long v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Central Bank v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Raney v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- Beasley v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Hartsfield v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Kendrick v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- George Washington Life Insurance v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Butler v. WintonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Johnson County v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945