Legal Opinion

McConnon & Co. v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1925No. 15567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Where the want of jurisdiction over the person is apparent upon the face” of the petition and proceedings, and the defendant has not waived his right to raise such question by plea, answer, or otherwise, he may take advantage of such defect by demurrer or motion to dismiss. Kendrick v. Whitfield, 20 Ga. 379; Wallace v. So. Express Co., 7 Ga. App. 565 (67 S. E. 694); Wash v. Kennedy, 23 Ga. App. 618, 620 (1) (99 S. E. 158). See also Northern Contracting Co. v. Maddux, 144 Ga. 686 (4) (87 R. E. 892); Hartsfield v. Morris, 89 Ga. 254 (15 S. E. 363); Jackson v. Hitchcock, 48 Ga. 491; Long v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Central Bank v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Raney v. McRaeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  3. Beasley v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Hartsfield v. MorrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. Kendrick v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George Washington Life Insurance v. PeacockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Butler v. WintonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Johnson County v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API