Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Cottrell, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*649The documents on file with the Colorado Secretary of State do not designate any "post office address specifically] for the purpose of mailing process” to either one of the two respondent corporations (Business Corporation Law § 307 [b] [2]). Because "no such address is there specified” (Business Corporation Law § 307 [b] [2]), the plaintiffs were free to mail process to any "registered or other office there specified” (Business Corporation Law § 307 [b] [2]). The present record shows that this is what the plaintiffs in fact did when they mailed process to an address in Englewood, Colorado,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flick v. Stewart-Warner Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Stewart v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hudson Valley Cablevision Corp. v. 202 Developers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Mayer v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wan Li Situ v. MTA Bus Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Friedman v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API