Legal Opinion

Danbury Rubber Co. v. Local 402, United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers of America

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1958PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

This appeal presents the question whether an arbitration award was made in time. The plaintiff and the defendant were operating under a collective bargaining agreement which provided for a grievance procedure. The agreement stated that if the preliminary measures for settling a grievance did not result in an adjustment, the grievance should be submitted to the Connecticut State Board of Mediation and Arbitration “to act as arbitrators whose decision shall be final and binding on both parties.” The agreement did not fix any time within which a decision should be made. The defendant referred a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters of America v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. City of Norwalk v. DanieleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Shanley v. JankuraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  4. Pratt, Read & Co. v. United Furniture Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. StewartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Schwarzschild v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Brandon v. HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Cicala v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. Edmundson v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. City of Milford v. Local 1566Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API