Legal Opinion

Hambleton v. Tenant

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1819PublishedCited by 1 opinion

-Appeal from Talbot County Court. This cause was before this court at December term 1811, (3 Harr. & Johns. on the appeal of the now appellee, and the judgment the county court was reversed, and the case remitted to that court, with a writ of procedendo directing a new trial, At the new trial in November 1816, the same testimony was offered in evidence by the parties which had been offered by them in the former trial.

Read the full summary

-Appeal from Talbot County Court. This cause was before this court at December term 1811, (3 Harr. & Johns. on the appeal of the now appellee, and the judgment the county court was reversed, and the case remitted to that court, with a writ of procedendo directing a new trial, At the new trial in November 1816, the same testimony was offered in evidence by the parties which had been offered by them in the former trial. And to the reading in evidence the deposition of E. N. Hambieton, the defendant,' the first trial again objected, on the ground of-its being illegal and incompetent evidence,…

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED (b.)) The reason for affirming the judgment in this case is given by the court in Clerklee vs. Mundell’s Lessee, (Post.)

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. DoubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API