Stefanick v. Ouellette
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
Though the petition was a Jack Jones form, it was good as against a general demurrer and was not defective so that a legal judgment could not be rendered thereon. The plaintiff in error contends that since the bonds sued for are nonnegotiable and must by their nature contain the name of the owner of the bond, the descriptions of the bonds were inadequate because the petition did not show that the bonds were issued in the name of the plaintiff. This contention is without merit since, assuming for the sake of argument that the description of each bond should have contained…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Small v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Rollins v. Personal Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Thomas v. BloodworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Chambless v. OATES PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Aiken v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Law Offices of Johnson & Robinson v. FortsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Walthour v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960