Legal Opinion

Noojin v. Alabama State Bar

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1990No. 89-994PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bert P. Noojin, a Mobile lawyer, appeals from an order of the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar suspending him from the practice of law for one year.

Noojin argues that the Disciplinary Board violated his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection by delaying or otherwise deferring disciplinary proceedings against him until he had served a period of probation imposed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, which prohibited him from practicing law for one year. As authority for this contention, he cites Rule 11, Rules of Disciplinary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. DISCIPLINARY BD. OF ALA. STATE BARSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Courtney v. Alabama State Bar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Haynes v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Davis v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Cooner v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Cooner v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  5. Anonymous v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API