Legal Opinion
Globe Navigation Co. v. Russ Lumber & Mill Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 10, 1908No. 13,774PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This is an action to recover the sum of $1,670.80, alleged to be due upon a contract of affreightment.
The libel alleges that on October 8, 1906, the libelant chartered to respondent the whole of the steamship Tampico, with the exception of the cabin and necessary room for the crew and the storage of provisions. for five consecutive voyages from two loading places on Puget Sound or Columbia river to San Francisco, Redondo, San Pedro, or San Diego, for the carriage of full cargoes of laths, shingles, and other lumber at prices therein specified. It further alleges that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Propeller Niagara v. CordesSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Maghee v. Camden & Amboy Railroad Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Crosby v. FitchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Oliver v. Maryland InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Maryland Insurance Company v. Le Roy, Bayard & M'eversSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The HermosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- The St. Johns N. F.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- C.A. Articulos Nacionales De Goma Gomaven v. M/v Aragua, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in RemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- The Rosalie HullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Maggio v. Mexico Arizona Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932