Legal Opinion
Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 10, 2010No. 2009-1547PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Matthew A. Pequignot appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granting summary judgment of no liability for false marking. Pequignot v. Solo Cup Co., 646 F.Supp.2d 790, 795-800 (E.D.Va.2009) (“SJ Op.”). Pequignot also appeals from the court’s determination of what constitutes an “offense” for the purpose of assessing the statutory fine. Id. at 801-804. Because Pequignot cannot show that Solo Cup Company (“Solo”) had the requisite intent to falsely mark its products, we affirm the court’s judgment of no liability.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bettcher Industries, Inc. v. Bunzl USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- In Re BP Lubricants USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Hitachi Home Electronics (America), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Two Moms & a Toy, LLC v. International Playthings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.