Morehouse v. Goodnight Bros. Construction
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
Madeline Morehouse appeals from a CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of her action against Goodnight Brothers Construction and Goodnight Construction, Inc. Morehouse contends the trial court erred in determining that she had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Respondents Goodnight Construction, Inc., ask this court to sanction Morehouse’s counsel for bringing a frivolous appeal. We decline to impose sanctions, but we affirm the dismissal order because no facts consistent with the complaint would support a determination that Respondents owed a legal duty to Morehouse.
I
Morehouse was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Bravo v. Dolsen CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Lauritzen v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Craig v. Washington Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.