Legal Opinion

Morehouse v. Goodnight Bros. Construction

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 24, 1995No. 34318-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Madeline Morehouse appeals from a CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of her action against Goodnight Brothers Construction and Goodnight Construction, Inc. Morehouse contends the trial court erred in determining that she had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Respondents Goodnight Construction, Inc., ask this court to sanction Morehouse’s counsel for bringing a frivolous appeal. We decline to impose sanctions, but we affirm the dismissal order because no facts consistent with the complaint would support a determination that Respondents owed a legal duty to Morehouse.

I

Morehouse was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hutchins v. 1001 Fourth Avenue AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bravo v. Dolsen CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Christen v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lauritzen v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Craig v. Washington Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API