Legal Opinion

Reinheimer v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 23, 1957No. Docket Nos. 53987, 53988Unpublished

Petitioner by an instrument incident to a divorce agreed to pay to his wife $87,000 alimony in gross "payable in periodic payments during a period ending more than ten (10) years" but with the time of such payments being so specified that the last payment was due and payable 21 days short of 10 years from the effective date of the agreement.

Read the full summary

Petitioner by an instrument incident to a divorce agreed to pay to his wife $87,000 alimony in gross "payable in periodic payments during a period ending more than ten (10) years" but with the time of such payments being so specified that the last payment was due and payable 21 days short of 10 years from the effective date of the agreement. Held, such payments not installment payments of alimony deductible by petitioner under sections 22(k) and 23(u) of I.R.C. 1939. Held, also, amount of certain entertainment expenses determined under rule of Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 Fed. (2d) 540.

1Opinion of the Court

Louis Reinheimer v. Commissioner. Louis Reinheimer and Dorythe Reinheimer v. Commissioner.

Reinheimer v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 53987, 53988.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1957-10; 1957 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 244; 16 T.C.M. (CCH) 56; T.C.M. (RIA) 57010;

January 23, 1957

Petitioner by an instrument incident to a divorce agreed to pay to his wife $87,000 alimony in gross "payable in periodic payments during a period ending more than ten (10) years" but with the time of such payments being so specified that the last payment was due and payable 21 days short of 10 years from the effective date of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Isfalt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API