Lexington Insurance Company v. Ryder System, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. "[A] contract of insurance couched in language chosen by the insurer is, if open to the construction contended for by the insured, to be construed most strongly, or strictly, against the insurer and liberally in favor of the contention of the insured.” Fokes v. Interstate Life &c. Ins. Co., 59 Ga. App. 680 (2 SE2d 170); Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. v. McDonald, 125 Ga. App. 394, 398 (188 SE2d 162). See also Aetna Fire Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Crawley, 132 Ga. App. 181 (1) (207 SE2d 666); Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Collins, 136 Ga. App. 671, 675 (222 SE2d 828).
2…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Durrett v. WoodsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Fokes v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Aetna Fire Underwriters Insurance v. CrawleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Southeastern Fidelity Insurance v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Vantage Dev. v. American Env. Tech.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Peachtree on Peachtree Investors, Ltd. v. Reed Drug Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. SnitzerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- City of Peru v. BernardiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.