Kanarek v. Davidson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
Plaintiff filed an action for damages under the federal Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 ) against named and unnamed Riverside County sheriff’s deputies and agents of the Franchise Tax Board for alleged deprivation of property without due process of law. The demurrer of the sheriff’s deputies on the ground that the complaint failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action was sustained without leave to amend and plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment of dismissal. 2
In reviewing a ruling on a demurrer, all material facts properly pleaded must be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Glaire v. La Lanne-Paris Health Spa, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Weil v. BarthelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Oscar Rios, Assignee v. Cessna Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franchise Tax Board v. United States Postal ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Golconda Screw, Inc. v. West Bottoms Ltd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Lebbos v. State BarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Goldman v. Wilsey Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.