Legal Opinion

Yang v. United States

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 8, 2021No. 3:16-cv-00441Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN KER YANG, Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. 16-cv-441-wmc 14-cr-70-wmc UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. On June 27, 2018, the court denied petitioner Ker Yang’s motion for post- conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Yang argued that he was entitled to a reduction in his sentence under the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States,

576 U.S. 591

(2015), holding that the vagueness of the “residual clause” in the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B), violated the due process clause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. United States v. Ker YangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Michael Wayne WadenaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API