Legal Opinion

Bonjour v. Bonjour

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1977No. 3000PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

*668BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from that portion of a divorce decree awarding the custody of a three and one-half year old boy to his father. Appellant, the mother of the boy, contends that the trial court erred in basing its custody award solely on the fact that she kept her son in a home where she was living with another man.

In the instant case, the trial court entered the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT

V

The court . . . finds that plaintiff has had the custody of Joseph Michael Bonjour, the minor son of the parties to this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horutz v. HorutzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Carle v. CarleAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Horton v. HortonAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Lacy v. LacyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bonjour v. BonjourAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Craig v. McBrideAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Nichols v. MandelinAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Monette v. HoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API